Paul McCartney & Wings

图片

wings9

收听、购买或分享

购买

购买
  • 数字格式下载
  • iTunes iTunes
  • 物理格式媒体
  • Amazon Amazon 搜索
  • eBay eBay 搜索
  • 5,351,776
    次音乐记录
  • 669,086
    位听众

标签

大家的标签

更多标签

传记

我们还没有关于此艺术家的介绍，想帮忙吗？

最佳专辑

收听趋势

669,086位听众
5,351,776次记录
最近收听趋势：

开始记录歌曲和追踪收听历史

Last.fm 用户记录使用 iTunes、Spotify、Rdio 及另外 200 种音乐播放器播放的音乐。

创建 Last.fm 专页

吼吼箱

留言。 登录 Last.fm 或注册用户。

  • alliedbakeries

    WINGS OVER THE WORLD on BBC FOUR. Makes me feel old !

    昨天 12:52 回复

  • staple_

    The Last.fm should unite "Paul McCartney & Wings" with only "Wings". They have always been a band only. There is no such separation contained in the tag name. Should join the scrobbles on one page only, for the Wings.

    5月 12日 21:35 回复

  • peedrofoster

    ♥ LONDON TOWN ♥

    5月 5日 3:05 回复

  • MaccaLeeCyrus

    Come on and call me back again ♫♫

    5月 2日 0:24 回复

  • talita_mendes

    ♥ let me roll it ♥

    4月 29日 20:38 回复

  • jazzthieve

    Spotify playlist: Classic Rock

    4月 4日 0:24 回复

  • sgtpepperlove13

    <3

    3月 7日 7:30 回复

  • doowniwevets

    Last.FM should merge "Wings" & "Paul McCartney & Wings" since it is two names for the same group. No matter how you look at it "Wings" was a band on its own with McCartney clearly as the front figure but don't forget that every member of "Wings" contributed to the songwriting and their sound. If Paul hadn't intended "Wings" to be its own thing he would have kept releasing albums under his own name. [2] All of my Wings music is tagged as "Wings". Less clutter, and truer to McCartney's intentions (this is one of the few times I have chosen to deviate from MusicBrainz's tags).

    2月 28日 19:53 回复

  • mota_boy_punky

    Yes, I know all that, and I've got this in mind before tagging it. But as I saw there were Wings and Paul McCartney & Wings with pretty as much listeners, and Musicbrainz named them like that too.

    2月 5日 14:36 回复

  • TheGreatChupon

    Keep in mind, mota_boy, that those two are Paul McCartney & Wings only because of the record label; Paul claimed to not've even been aware that they were released as such! I don't know how much truth there is to that, but it's obvious that it was always Wings in *his* head, and he of all people should have the final say, shouldn't he? But yeah, David, I'd totally agree that Flaming Pie is his most successful post-Wings effort! That's if we don't consider McCartney II post-Wings, since it was technically made while Wings was still an active unit.

    2月 1日 23:12 回复

  • mota_boy_punky

    Red Rose Speedway and Band On The Run are Paul McCartney & Wings, the rest is Wings. I keep my tags that way, as they are on the album covers.

    1月 31日 20:01 回复

  • Juhwithguns

    should it be tagged Paul McCartney & Wings or just Wings? '-'

    1月 22日 20:28 回复

  • Metamorphic_

    Last.FM should merge "Wings" & "Paul McCartney & Wings" since it is two names for the same group. No matter how you look at it "Wings" was a band on its own with McCartney clearly as the front figure but don't forget that every member of "Wings" contributed to the songwriting and their sound. If Paul hadn't intended "Wings" to be its own thing he would have kept releasing albums under his own name.

    2012年 12月 30日 回复

  • DavidSmith98

    The Beatles were a band; Wings is essentially a McCartney solo project. Flaming Pie is great, Flower in The Dirt is good for 80s music. I don't buy the argument his genius ran out, but I do think Flaming Pie is his most brilliant post Wings.

    2012年 12月 27日 回复

  • TheFatChocobo

    See discussion below. (Not far to look!)

    2012年 12月 26日 回复

  • desafio520

    Why don´t just unite Paul McCartney, Wings and Paul McCartney and the Wings in one sole band? I know there are a lot of differences, and discussions, but it just don´t seem right to see his music split. Deep Purple, Iron Maiden and so many other bands had plenty of periods and changes but the name is just one. I think that is a historical debate, not a tag debate. When we look at the number of songs played, it seems Paul McCartney is little listened! And Why? Because of so many categorization and divisions.

    2012年 12月 22日 回复

  • ericsonolsen

    Just merge the whole thing to Wings!

    2012年 12月 5日 回复

  • TheFatChocobo

    And by your argument, shouldn't you be tagging a lot of Paul's Beatles stuff as Paul McCartney, too? What are his songs on Let It Be and Abbey Road if not Paul telling John, Paul, and Ringo exactly what to play, just as he so often did later with his Wings bandmates?

    2012年 10月 8日 回复

  • TheFatChocobo

    And actually, Tug of War/Pipes of Peace is a perfect example: if the final Wings sessions in 1980, which featured a bunch of songs from those two, had been successful, a Wings follow-up to Back to the Egg (had Paul the presence of mind to pull the best tracks) could've been really good. As is, both Tug & Pipes suck! And after that, Paul seemed to really struggle to get a good sound on any of his albums. Off the Ground has a *great* band sound but not enough good songs; only Flaming Pie and Chaos and Creation manage to get an interesting post-Wings album-length coherence out of McCartney, and C&C needed Nigel Godrich for that anyway.

    2012年 10月 8日 回复

  • TheFatChocobo

    As for Mr. Denny Laine, London Town wouldn't be half the album it is without his input, and he had a surprising amount of input into the others as well. But the main point is, even if Paul McCartney did 90% of the creative work, he *wanted* to be playing with that band, with those musicians, and (as far as I'm concerned) did his best work for them. The demise of Wings also marks the spot where I think Paul's genius finally ran out. (I consider Paul's glory period to be 1968 to 1980, and that coincides almost exactly with Wings' tenure. I'm not as keen on his really poppy, more straightforward early Beatles stuff, pre-White Album, and I think he lost the thread once he got back with George Martin for Tug of War.)

    2012年 10月 8日 回复
    • 全部 303 条评论

正在收听

顶级听众