AmaroK or Rhythmbox?

第 25 页，共 25 页上一页 1... 23 24 25

- flame_leaf 说...
- 用户
- 2011年 11月 20日, 1:11
@skrimstla: No, it's not, but it does require KDE packages to run.

[quote][b][user]flame_leaf[/user][/b] 说： @skrimstla: No, it's not, but it does require KDE packages to run.[/quote]

固定链接引用
- Nightbane112 说...
- 用户
- 2011年 11月 27日, 13:29
Guayadeque!! ^_^

It's not how you live your life but it's how you savor every moment of it...

[quote][b][user]Nightbane112[/user][/b] 说： Guayadeque!! ^_^ [/quote]

固定链接引用
- kickAlfin 说...
- 用户
- 2011年 12月 21日, 22:47
prefer using clementine than the others :D

[quote][b][user]kickAlfin[/user][/b] 说： prefer using clementine than the others :D[/quote]

固定链接引用
- shionjiyuuko 说...
- 用户
- 2011年 12月 25日, 4:36
Exclusively use MPD, occasionally mplayer2 (for music with messy tags)

[quote][b][user]shionjiyuuko[/user][/b] 说： Exclusively use MPD, occasionally mplayer2 (for music with messy tags)[/quote]

固定链接引用
- almohandes 说...
- 用户
- 2011年 12月 31日, 10:23
Rhythmbox

[quote][b][user]almohandes[/user][/b] 说： Rhythmbox[/quote]

固定链接引用
- ashandvc 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 1月 3日, 12:35
amarok, love kde

[quote][b][user]ashandvc[/user][/b] 说： amarok, love kde[/quote]

固定链接引用
- Lie13 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 1月 5日, 14:20
I used to think Rhytmbox is the best playes. Then I gone for Banshee. And now I use Clementine. It's a good one.

[quote][b][user]Lie13[/user][/b] 说： I used to think Rhytmbox is the best playes. Then I gone for Banshee. And now I use Clementine. It's a good one.[/quote]

固定链接引用
- pylaochos 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 2月 17日, 11:01
Clementine !!
ONLY Clementine : 3

[quote][b][user]pylaochos[/user][/b] 说： Clementine !! ONLY Clementine : 3[/quote]

固定链接引用
- ptck_ 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 2月 18日, 18:04
~~Clementine is my fav.~~

Screw clementine and other native players, foobar works with wine, lovely!

Foobar2000 for the win!

[quote][b][user]ptck_[/user][/b] 说： [s]Clementine is my fav.[/s] Screw clementine and other native players, foobar works with wine, lovely! Foobar2000 for the win![/quote]
由 ptck_ 在 2012年 3月 7日, 17:41 编辑

固定链接引用
- SUSEHurricane 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 3月 5日, 9:51
Amarok

[quote][b][user]SUSEHurricane[/user][/b] 说： Amarok[/quote]

固定链接引用
- profundal 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 3月 5日, 20:50
VLC.

Rhythmbox, Banshee and Audacious felt buggy, slow and partly unresponsive on my old notebook, all three of them crashed regularly. VLC is the only that appears to be relatively reliable without using too much CPU and memory.

[quote][b][user]profundal[/user][/b] 说： VLC. Rhythmbox, Banshee and Audacious felt buggy, slow and partly unresponsive on my old notebook, all three of them crashed regularly. VLC is the only that appears to be relatively reliable without using too much CPU and memory.[/quote]

固定链接引用
- flame_leaf 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 3月 7日, 21:42
^Ever tried QuodLibet?

[quote][b][user]flame_leaf[/user][/b] 说： ^Ever tried QuodLibet?[/quote]

固定链接引用
- irenicus09 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 3月 11日, 6:28
Rhythmbox > Amarok.

If I would go for a GUI based player...imo nothing beats "Banshee" in terms of features.

But personally I use this: http://irenicus09.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/commandline-based-music-player/

[quote][b][user]irenicus09[/user][/b] 说： Rhythmbox > Amarok. If I would go for a GUI based player...imo nothing beats "Banshee" in terms of features. But personally I use this: http://irenicus09.wordpress.com/2012/03/06/commandline-based-music-player/ [/quote]

固定链接引用
- profundal 说...
- 用户
- 2012年 3月 14日, 17:04
@flame_leaf thanks, never heard of QuodLibet, but I'm gonna try it soon :)

[quote][b][user]profundal[/user][/b] 说： @flame_leaf thanks, never heard of QuodLibet, but I'm gonna try it soon :)[/quote]

固定链接引用

匿名用户不能张贴消息。请登录或创建账户后再到论坛发帖。